The Pennsylvania Supreme Court drew a new map for the state’s 18 congressional districts after it ruled the previous map violated the state’s constitution due to partisan gerrymandering. This week’s Lecture Spark discusses recent and upcoming court decisions as well as the history behind gerrymandering.
Instructors, click the link below to download this week’s lecture for use in your classroom. The deck contains a writing prompt, a debate question, as well as other assessment questions.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Issues New Congressional Map To Replace Gerrymandered One
New Pennsylvania map gives Democrats big boost in midterms
Republican challenge to Pennsylvania map likely to fail
Why the new Pennsylvania map is a ‘huge’ deal in the fight for House control
Partisan Gerrymandering Has Benefited the GOP, Analysis Shows
Geography, Not Gerrymandering, May Explain GOP’s Hold On House
Simple Steps to Eliminate Gerrymandering
The Map That Popularized the Word ‘Gerrymander’
Ohio Redistricting Reform Proposal
- Writing: Explain why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided the state’s old district lines violated the state’s constitution.
- Debate: The US Supreme Court should declare gerrymandering a violation of the US Constitution.
- Poll: Gerrymandered congressional and legislative districts are one of the top five issues in American politics.
- Short Answer: Explain the concept of a gerrymandered district.
Current events quiz:
1) Gerrymandering is a recent phenomena in American politics. (T/F)
2) The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered the state legislature to draw the state’s congressional districts. When it refused, the Court redrew them on its own. (T/F)
3) Partisanship in the US Senate is largely due to gerrymandering. (T/F)
4) Gerrymandering is the process of
a. Redrawing congressional district every 10 years
b. Choosing members of the US Senate
c. Redrawing districts to benefit one party over another
d. Choosing members of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
5) Gerrymandering is largely a _____ action.